As President Biden's term approaches its end, questions arise about the potential for pardons and who might be in line for clemency. Jesse Watters weighs in on the stakes and implications of such decisions.
As President Joe Biden’s time in office draws to a close, speculation about his potential use of presidential pardoning power has intensified. While the pardon power is granted by the U.S. Constitution, it remains one of the most controversial and closely scrutinized tools in the president’s arsenal. With the end of Biden’s term looming, questions are swirling: will the president extend clemency to anyone before leaving office? And, if so, who could be on the list, and what are the implications of such decisions?
The prospect of pardons raises complex political, legal, and ethical questions, particularly as the country faces an increasingly polarized political climate. This article will explore the dynamics behind presidential pardons, assess the potential candidates for clemency, and examine the broader implications of these decisions as Biden prepares for his transition out of office.
The power to grant pardons is embedded in Article II, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution, which states: “The President shall have power to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States, except in cases of impeachment.” This broad authority allows the president to absolve individuals of federal crimes, eliminating or reducing penalties and even restoring civil rights. The power is considered virtually unchecked, with few constraints beyond the exception for impeachment cases.
Despite its constitutional foundation, the use of the pardon power is often contentious, especially when it involves high-profile individuals or controversial decisions. In recent administrations, the granting of pardons has been used as a political tool, sparking debates about fairness, justice, and the public’s trust in the legal system.
Throughout his presidency, Joe Biden has faced scrutiny over how he might exercise this power. While Biden has not granted as many pardons as some of his predecessors, such as President Donald Trump, who issued 143 pardons in his final year, the issue of clemency remains a significant aspect of his legacy. Many have wondered if Biden will use this power to address injustices, correct what some view as past wrongs, or alleviate the burden of mass incarceration, which has been a focal point of his domestic policy.
The question of who might receive a presidential pardon is complicated by a variety of factors, including political considerations, public opinion, and the specific nature of the offenses committed. While Biden has been cautious in his use of clemency, there are several categories of individuals who could be in line for a pardon in the final months of his administration.
As with any outgoing president, high-profile individuals who have been involved in political controversies may be potential candidates for pardons. In Biden’s case, speculation often focuses on figures connected to former President Donald Trump’s administration or political allies.
One area where Biden could make a significant impact is through pardons for nonviolent drug offenders. This is a key part of his broader criminal justice reform agenda. With over 2 million people incarcerated in the United States, a significant number of these individuals are serving sentences for drug-related offenses. Many of these individuals were convicted under laws that are now widely regarded as overly punitive, particularly for low-level drug offenses.
Throughout his presidency, Biden has acknowledged the need to correct instances of over-incarceration. There is growing public pressure to release individuals who have been incarcerated for relatively minor offenses, particularly those convicted of low-level drug crimes or other nonviolent offenses.
Some advocates argue that pardoning those who have already served significant time for these offenses could help alleviate the backlog in the prison system and restore justice to individuals whose punishment may have been disproportionate to their crime. In the final months of Biden’s presidency, this group is likely to be a focal point of clemency discussions.
While the decision to grant a pardon is ultimately up to the president, the political implications of such decisions cannot be ignored. Pardon decisions are often viewed through the lens of public opinion, political influence, and, occasionally, personal or partisan motivations. Biden’s choices in this area could impact his legacy and political future, especially as he navigates the polarized political landscape of the U.S.
Granting pardons to controversial figures, such as political allies or former criminals, can spark heated debates. Opponents of a particular pardon may argue that it is politically motivated or represents a misuse of presidential power. On the other hand, supporters may view pardons as a necessary step toward healing and reconciliation.
For Biden, striking a balance between making tough, unpopular decisions and addressing systemic issues like mass incarceration will be critical. His pardoning decisions could either enhance or damage his relationship with key voting blocs, including progressives who support criminal justice reform and conservatives who may be wary of broad clemency initiatives.
While the presidential pardon power is extensive, it is not without limits. A pardon cannot undo a conviction in a state court, and it does not absolve individuals of civil liabilities or fines. Additionally, pardons cannot reverse an impeachment or protect individuals from state prosecution.
The potential legal risks of granting pardons are another consideration that Biden must weigh carefully. Pardoning individuals involved in ongoing investigations or criminal cases could be viewed as interference in the judicial process. Furthermore, Biden must consider the long-term implications of his decisions, especially in cases that may prompt future legal challenges or political fallout.
As President Biden approaches the final months of his term, the issue of pardons and clemency will undoubtedly remain a point of contention. Whether Biden chooses to extend clemency to high-profile figures, nonviolent offenders, or individuals who have served long sentences for minor crimes, his decisions will shape his legacy and set the tone for future administrations’ use of the pardon power.
The potential for a final wave of pardons also highlights the broader issues at play—criminal justice reform, systemic inequality, and the role of executive power in shaping the nation’s legal landscape. As Biden considers his options, he faces a critical decision: how best to use his pardon power to address past injustices and move the country toward a more equitable future.
For more on presidential clemency and its implications, visit The White House Briefing Room and CNN Politics.
See more ABC News Feed
Bernard Kerik, former NYPD commissioner during 9/11, has died at 69.
Harrison Ruffin Tyler, grandson of President John Tyler, dies at 96.
Hombre arrestado en Houston por exhibicionismo ante un menor de edad.
Explore how a prison kitchen job may have helped a police chief escape.
Toronto man pleads guilty after assaulting TSA agents at Miami airport.